The emonPiCM

The history of emonLib, and why we want Continuous Monitoring

The original emonTx was designed as a small, battery-powered device for monitoring whole-house power, which transmitted its data to the emonGLCD – a liquid crystal display. As such, it was essential that it operated at minimum power and the “discrete sample” monitoring mode was created (though it was never called that until much later). In this mode, current is sampled for approx. 200 ms, and the data sent by radio to the GLCD. The emonTx then goes to sleep for about 10 s, using very little power, before repeating the measurement sequence.

This works surprisingly well provided the power demand doesn’t fluctuate rapidly. But there’s a problem if a load is switched on and off rapidly, with only a few seconds in either state (e.g. an oven or hob). If the load is switched on while the emonTx is “asleep”, the energy consumed during that interval won’t be recorded, hence the average power measurement will be incorrect.

Converting the emonPi to continuous monitoring

A few years before emonLibCM became standard for the emonTx, the emonTx V3 had been introduced. V3 uses the RFM69CW radio, which is capable of handling the transmitted data as one complete message. The emonTx 3-phase sketch needs to use this capability because the processor is too busy taking and processing measurements to be able to handle the radio traffic one character at a time. Neither the 3-phase sketch, nor the standard emonTx sketch, now use JeeLib, but the transmitted message is totally compatible with JeeLib – or JeeLib in compatibility mode, as the mode for the original message format is now called.

Implementing continuous monitoring on the emonPi is difficult because of the need to handle incoming radio traffic while continuously monitoring two power channels (and optionally, reading as many as 6 temperature sensors.) The RFM69CW employs what is called “packet mode”. The transmitter can accept the entire message into its internal buffer, then transmit it independently of the processor. Meanwhile, the receiver can, independently of its processor, receive, validate and hold the message, ready for processing when the processor can handle it. What JeeLabs could not predict when they created the ‘classic’ JeeLib packet format was that Hope’s packet format for the RFM69CW would be different, making it impossible to use the RFM69CW’s ‘native’ format, yet be compatible with anything using the ‘classic’ JeeLib format.

Therefore, if you want to use emonPiCM and other sensing nodes sending their data by radio, there is no choice, the format that OEM uses must change. If you only have an emonPi, you can use CM if you wish, there is nothing else to change. If you have other nodes sending by radio and don’t want or need CM on the emonPi, or you use an emonBase, there’s no need to change.


There appeared to be three main options:

  1. Use the LowPowerLabs library. It is well-established, it lives up to its name by using a low data rate of 4799 bits per second, which allows the transmitter power to be turned down. That’s eminently suitable for environmental monitoring, but the regulations regarding the use of the radio band mean that the emonTx running the standard CM sketch would be breaking the law if it transmitted more than once every 8.5 s.

  2. Write our own software library. As mentioned above, both the emonTx 3-phase sketch and the standard emonTx CM sketch use our own transmitter library, but an equivalent receiver library has not been written.

  3. Use the JeeLabs RFM69 driver. This is, compared against JeeLib, a very simple piece of software and is easy to understand. It has a couple of shortcomings: it does not check that the channel is free before transmitting, and there was a bug in the receiver code that resulted in an incorrect RSSI value being returned.


On the basis of these factors, the decision was made to go with the JeeLabs RFM69 driver, patched to correct the RSSI bug, for the emonPi and emonTH. For the mains-powered emonTx and emonTx Shield, we modified the OEM transmitter software to check that the channel is clear before transmitting.

The emonPiCM front-end sketch

The sketch that runs in the Atmel ATMega 328P primarily provides the energy monitoring function and handles the radio traffic coming in from other sensor nodes.

It uses emonLibCM, set up for two current channels, to obtain and process current and voltage readings and, from external sensors, temperature readings and the pulse input.

It is now possible to fully calibrate the emonPi. Calibration commands come in via the serial data connection from the Raspberry Pi. The interface has been designed so that these commands can be generated manually and routed to the front end via the Raspberry Pi, and so that it might be possible at some future time to set up and calibrate the front end via the emonHub/emonCMS GUI. (55.6 KB)

MD5 Hashes: 9de88226b6376cdaab49e5f97bcfcbab
emonPiFrontEndCM.ino 6be0b5c1c7a4d305b3970ed0d6e0806a
emonPiFrontEndCM_config.ino 7c2e2ba7937f5b7de47d9fecb6a92ff8
emonPiFrontEndCM.pdf 9dbe63138121b5842bb5eb1779a1f6be

Loading the front-end sketch

The file must be compiled with the “Export compiled binary” command and the resulting .hex file (NOT the one having with_bootloader in the name) transferred to the emonPi. The procedure to get it from there into the “emon” front-end processor is given in section 8 of the emonPi Wiki: EmonPi - OpenEnergyMonitor Wiki

Supporting sketches for monitor nodes

The sketches listed below are available. They send r.f. data in the new ‘RFM69 native’ format to the emonPiCM. The single-phase energy monitoring ones have also been updated to use emonLibCM and include a standardised on-line configuration and calibration section.

emonTx V3.4 single phase: EmonTxV34CM_rfm69n.ino (71.4 KB)

MD5 Hashes: 034f48fa8c65e7e3587f3359841539d6
EmonTxV34CM_rfm69n.ino 92f516f0547c5d440ae8a867d17cde8d
EmonTxV34CM_rfm69n_config.ino c0cb3167db3c7ae161f91e305cd57030
EmonTxV34CM_rfm69n.pdf 4e14bb8b09deac0a173eb669b064f0f7


emonTx Shield single phase: EmonTxShieldCM_rfm69n.ino (69.0 KB)

MD5 Hashes: f3c59f2fec041597c70912a557312acd
EmonShieldCM_rfm69n.ino 96ab9d0359ad61f7bdda81414f521fc1
EmonTxShieldCM_rfm69n_config.ino d0faf73e18e7a715a2b318423eb97f38
EmonTxShieldCM_rfm69n.pdf ef9be26c14c035e01e08903e69dbc439


emonTH: EmonTH_V2_rfm69n.ino
(note: This sketch offers no protection against r.f. collisions – protection may be enabled but battery life is shortened, possibly to below 75%, depending on r.f. traffic) (54.8 KB)

MD5 Hashes: d5bbacbbbeaa93d15daf30d9fb1055e0
EmonTH_V2_rfm69n.ino e420a993e2ccffcef19dbcd113a9a538
EmonTH_V2_rfm69n_config.ino a426e90d982a49c30d3140fe86bce2c3
EmonTH_V2_rfm69n.pdf cb5488cb4ee5811326ac7a3e28161dcd


emonTx V3.2: EmonTxV32CM_rfm69n.ino (45.4 KB)

MD5 Hashes: 9d8091c2219481c99fecbf824c91b0a9
EmonTxV32CM_rfm69n.ino 0266d4f8a5ccbe4f123674fa10a6e11b
EmonTxV32CM_rfm69n_config.ino 8be37cb658ea94664924212f7ce2c4e0
EmonTxV32CM_rfm69n.pdf 356a6735361c56a814fa22b9f0f8bcb2


emonTx_V2 (RFM12B or RFM69CW): emonTx_V2_CT123_Voltage_Temp_Pulse_rfm69n.ino (59.5 KB)

MD5 Hashes: 39e3e4a5ecdabb2bf54481259941c47e
emonTx_V2_CT123_Voltage_Temp_Pulse_rfm69n.ino df10b3a4e87d1f0f0e1e47501f0cfe50
emonTx_V2_CT123_Voltage_Temp_Pulse_rfm69n_config.ino 8bdaf7b9998734cbd6b7f2b9dce7511e
emonTx_V2_CT123_Voltage_Temp_Pulse_rfm69n.pdf fe88dcd340dfcbbc07cce4b2db1dd02f


emonTx 3-phase emonTx_3Phase_PLL_rfm69n
(all hardware variants, both Classic and RFM69 Native formats)


Existing sketches for the GLCD can be recompiled using a patched version of JeeLib. See below.


There should be no need for an emonBase to use the new ‘RFM69 native’ format – it will only be required if and when the 'RFM69 native’ format becomes the standard. Until then, the only use case will be if it replaces an emonPiCM, thereby removing the need to convert the monitor nodes back to the ‘RFM69 classic’ format. (42.2 KB)

MD5 Hashes: 36c77071de009140440e51245dde66f1
emonBase_rfm69n.ino 1ee9c827c85e76762f37ff80067dfee7
emonBase_rfm69n_config.ino b01d0e4d902aa29f74a621c05d8dd562
emonBase_rfm69n.pdf 860269ae8f68f506303a85c13005b49a


Required Libraries

emonLibCM (68.1 KB)

MD5 Hashes: c1a8edaf7a180e28a193dbba2fee89de
emonEProm.cpp da16b3739adcf6a0f720051e7e08c149
emonEProm.h 66d5cbbf4cc932c80279acdcbae15289
emonEPromLib.pdf a5c5695012ad958453db11c482c91f4a (38.0 KB)

MD5 Hashes: 70ec1533b6d45a9c38716a8ae73b4ccf
rf69.h 8ce7152c65b7191cf1c34775e1af3507
spi.h d82e7b87d107d902025fb1b10645e3b3
rf69.pdf 679e6240c03ea6c4447451c3dee96f5b (62.2 KB)

MD5 Hashes: 463ffcb0fbd1e05c16882435e83a9999
rfm69nTxLib.cpp cea9746029b7a530c5fd940984ff8124
rfm69nTxLib.h 4382e1f74f0338791aeca77cece72f5e
rfm69nTxLib.pdf 28675fa24962f35611ba70483baa66eb

Libraries used by each sketch:

emonPi front end:

  • emonLibCM
  • emonEProm
  • rf69

emonTx V3.4 (single phase),
emonTx Shield (single phase),
emonTx V3.2 (single phase),
emonTx_V2: (single phase):

  • emonLibCM
  • emonEProm
  • rfm69nTxLib

EmonTH V2:

  • *power
  • *sleep
  • rfm69nTxLib
  • emonEProm
  • JeeLib (JeeLabs)
  • OneWire (Paul Stoffregen)
  • DallasTemperature (Miles Burton)

emonLibCM requires:

  • *Arduino
  • *Wprogram
  • *SPI
  • *crc16
  • OneWire (Paul Stoffregen)

emonEProm requires:


* This is a standard Arduino library.

Sketches for emonGLCD

It is possible to convert JeeLib to operate in RFM69 Native mode, however great care must be taken as it means making a change to one of the JeeLib files itself. When this is done, most of the emonGLCD sketches should work with sensor nodes and emonPi that are using the RFM69 ‘native’ message format.

In the file RF12.h, near the top, you will find these lines:

/// RFM12B driver definitions

// Modify the RF12 driver in such a way that it can inter-operate with RFM69
// modules running in "native" mode. This affects packet layout and some more.

#define RF12_COMPAT 0

Change the last line to read

#define RF12_COMPAT 1

Now, for the IDE to recognise the change, you must completely exit the Arduino IDE, restart it and compile the sketch as normal.

If for any reason you need to revert to the JeeLib ‘Classic’ mode, you must restore the line to its original state and restart the IDE. Due to the way the Arduino IDE works, it is NOT possible to have two versions of the library - even in different directories.

Reference Documents

JeeLabs publications:

JeeLabs published 5 separate documents describing the RMF69 Native format. Those and a chart showing the various formats have been consolidated for convenience into a single PDF document:

JeeLib Radios RFM69 Native.pdf (859.5 KB)

The original JeeLabs documents are:

RFM69 on ATmega » JeeLabs:

Classic vs native packets » JeeLabs:

RF compatibility options » JeeLabs:

RF69 native on ATmega’s » JeeLabs:

Using RFM12’s with RFM69 native » JeeLabs:

Design of the “old” RF12 Driver:

Inside the RF12 driver » JeeLabs:

Inside the RF12 driver – part 2 » JeeLabs:

Inside the RF12 driver – part 3 » JeeLabs:

RF12 packet format and design » JeeLabs:

RF12 broadcasts and ACKs » JeeLabs:

Data Sheets:

RFM12B Radio Module:

RFM69CW Radio Module:


Thank you for posting this up @Robert.Wall I know this has been a significant amount of work for you over quite some time, with a lot of careful testing and documentation. @glyn.hudson @Gwil and I, and I’m sure everyone else here really appreciate your efforts in putting this together. Thanks again!

As a humble emonPi owner, can someone explain if all this good work is relevant to me? What prompted this effort, did something change in the emonPi hardware?

I understand the first 3 paragraphs about the emonTx. Does “Converting the emonPi to continuous monitoring” describe work that was done in the past, or a plan for the future?

‘Hope’ is the maker of the RFM radios, right? Is the RFM69CW what we have in the emonPi? What is emonPiCM and why would I want to use it?

The emonPiCM is an emonPi running Continuous Monitoring software in the “emon” front end, bringing it into line with the software that’s been standard in the emonTx V3.4 since August 2020.

I don’t understand what you’re trying to ask, or the point you’re trying to make. As the software has now been released and is available for download from the links above or from the emonPi’s Admin menu, it’s obviously in the past. For you, until you download it and use it, it is in the future. @TrystanLea has indicated that CM will become standard for emonPi’s bought from the shop at some stage - no decision has been made regarding when.

Yes to the first; yes and in the emonTx V3.4 for the second, and for the third, did you read all of the first two sections of the first post here, down to but not including “Options” ? If you’ve read that and still don’t understand, try to explain why you don’t understand.

Thanks, that’s clearer, especially the part about the new software being the future standard for emonPi.

It’s obvious to you where this project fits in because you’ve been working on it for a long time. For someone like me, coming to it cold, it would be good to start by saying “we’ve been working on some new software for emonPi which adds/improves features X, Y and Z”.

I am currently looking at deploying additional EmonTx V3.4.3 modules with the emonTx_3Phase_PLL Firmware, my existing one install is using V1.7 firmware, as the newer ones will use a different emonPi I am trying to decide if I use emonPiCM for my next install.

However if I try to build The emonTx_3Phase_PLL_rfm69n code V2.0.x for with #define RF_CLASSIC instead of #define RF_NATIVE I get

rfmTxLib.h: No such file or directory.

However I don’t see rfmTxLib in the list of libs above

what am I missing ?

rfmTxLib of course! It has been available for a long time - a year to be precise, but hasn’t been picked up by anyone and listed on Github…
I’ve added it to the 3-phase sketch thread: Update to 3-Phase PLL sketch - #22 by Robert.Wall

[Just to confirm I have this right, and hopefully save the next person some time!]

So for someone buying a brand new emonpi, and a emontx from the store today containing “latest continuous sampling firmware” and wanting to also use the emonpi in continuous sampling mode in, the steps to enable it are:

  1. Buy the USB to UART lead for flashing emontx

  2. Update emonTX to the “rfm69nTxLib” firmware (incompatible radio format with historic jeelib format)
    (ref. Update to 3-Phase PLL sketch - #22 by Robert.Wall)

  3. Flash emonpi to the “Native RFM68 (New)” Firmware
    (in the web U emonpi/admin/update)

  4. Edit the emonpi emonhub config so that node [[5]] contains the following:
    (in emonpi/config)
    → Edit Confg
    (ref emonPiFrontEndCM/emonPiFrontEndCM.ino at main · openenergymonitor/emonPiFrontEndCM · GitHub)

### For the "New" RFM69 firmware supporting continuous monitoring
    nodename = emonpi
       names = power1,power2,power1pluspower2,vrms,t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,pulse1count,pulse2count,E1,E2
       datacodes = h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, h, L, L, l, l
       scales = 1,1,1, 0.01, 0.01,0.01,0.01,0.01,0.01,0.01, 1, 1, 1,1
       units = W,W,W, V, C,C,C,C,C,C, p, p, Wh,Wh

As an aside, I’ve notice the emonpi “Update Firmware” option does not seem to be entirely sticky. After a few reboots it seems to sometime regress back to the old firmware, and re-updating it to the new one is needed to fix it. Is that a known issue / expect?


Welcome, Jonatan, to the OEM forum.

Until the CM software is officially adopted for the emonPi, then I’m afraid you’ll need to continue to rewrite the “emon” CM software in the Atmel '328P front end, because the default is to always overwrite it with the “new” update (but it isn’t ‘new’ to you, it’s an update to the discrete sample version).

I don’t know what’s on Github (I’ve tried but I can’t understand it), the release and as far as I know, the up-to-date version is here: The emonPiCM

Note, ANY sensor node working to the emonPiCM will need its software changing, according to that post.

I don’t think there’s any problem with the CM software, however it might be a good idea to fire up your system using the installed software, just to prove it works, before you change anything.

Also note, I can only support the Arduino IDE for compiling and uploading the sketches.


  1. Buy the USB to UART lead for flashing emontx - Correct

  2. Update emonTX to the “rfm69nTxLib” firmware (incompatible radio format with historic jeelib format)
    (ref. Update to 3-Phase PLL sketch - #22 by Robert.Wall) Only if you have a 3-phase supply. You haven’t put where you are in the world, so I can’t guess.

  3. Flash emonpi to the “Native RFM68 (New)” Firmware
    (in the web U emonpi/admin/update) I don’t know that this is the correct front end software, I proceed as I’ve noted in the post where the software was released - linked above, using Remmina (other tools are available) to transfer the file to the emonPi.

  4. Edit the emonpi emonhub config… You’ll find details of the config file entry at the top of each sketch - for the sensor nodes as well as the emonPi’s front end itself.

Thanks for the speedy reply! For full context, I already had the emonpi using continuous sampling mode (via that "Native RFM68 (New)” Firmware) fine for several months. I just got the emonTx this week (happy to see it had the “CM fw” preinstalled!) and was scratching my head for a while as to why it would not connect! It all makes sense now I read it through over again, that CM on the Tx side does not imply “using the new protocol”. I’ve now put the emonpi back to stock FW for now and it is indeed working fine :+1:

I indeed only have single phase (in the UK) so it would be EmonTxV34CM_rfm69n I need then.

I hadn’t seen the full set of steps needed in a concise form so wanted to check the overall steps in the recipe is correct (even if I got some of the ingredients wrong :grimacing:)

FWIW my original goal is tracking PV import/export and also controlling redirect (to immersion heater) so I’m okay going back to the old radio protocol, as on balance CM isn’t quite as useful as I hoped:

  1. The E1 and E2 accumulators don’t track “import” and “export” separately, so it’s not possible to properly track how much was spent/returned on energy coming from/to grid at different rates. (I believe this would need to follow the “1 Wh bucket” principle to be representative of UK meters’ billing personality)
  2. The sampling frequency of 1/5 Hz is lower than the ideal responsiveness for PV redirect, but it had seemed rather complicated to increase it.
    I see adding RF reception (or 1-wire thermistors) is the main impediment to increasing sampling frequency. I have the option to connect the emonTx via serial cable so I might still do that anyway at some point.


That’s true, just as it’s true for emonLib and the Discrete Sampling emonTx and emonPi, but it would be relatively easy to separate import and export. Normally, that task is left to emonCMS. The CM library itself can report a lot faster than

(I don’t know where you got that number from). The true sampling frequency of the library depends on the number of c.t’s - for the emonPi with two, it’s around 3 kHz, the minimum reporting period is 0.1 s.

Sorry, wrong terminology! I mean the reporting frequency. I’m sending the grid import/export over MQTT to a Loxone controller where all the real logic (currently) lives, and the external messages to that are limited to 5s interval.

This is welcome news if it means that it is possible to use a burst or phase diverter (e.g. the famous Emley Mk2).
I assume this is all “tried and tested”, but I’ve not found anything via the Search to confirm this.

Could someone confirm that changing the firmware as above does indeed give a decent level of accuracy and fidelity.
Thanks in advance…

The software is exactly the same as used in the emonTx since October 2019, except that it scans 3 channels (1 voltage, 2 current) instead of 5 (1 voltage, 4 current) and thus scans slightly faster, which should lead to a small improvement where higher order harmonics are present.

It will be as accurate, or as inaccurate, as component tolerances and your calibration allows.

Hi Robert,

First, I want to say great work - specifically on joining all the dots on the radio formats. It’s great to be able to use RFM69 in it’s native mode which gives so many benefits. It was also fantastic to read all the information on how RF12 can be made to use the same RFM69 packet format, allowing us to have a mixed network of old & new with simple firmware update.
The great thing was you’ve provided a way to update all the OEM devices including GLCD to be able to continue to function. It really is an amazing effort, never mind the benefits of CM.
The little atmel chip can breath a nice sigh of relief now sending and receiving is offloaded to the RFM69… although I’m sure it is now sweating more doing CM instead!

However, I am confused as to why you moved away from the established command format , (reverse polish) to the extent you lock it out when you see it on the input stream.
I was looking at the code making sure I could still transmit data, and instead of being able to send ‘bytes’ as previously, it seems to send alphanumeric strings which is likely not what most applications need, nor is it compatible with the previous raspberry-atmel interface, making this not ‘plug and play’ with current emonhub send functionality.

Previously, we would send by sending decimal numbers between 0-255 , comma-separated, followed by ,s eg. 12,122,244,33,7,s would send a 4 byte packet to node 7.
I was looking at submitting a patch to put this functionality back so EMONGLCD (and other sending tools) could run without changes to emonhub or how they send, but I thought I’d ask first as it seems to have deliberately broken this backward compatibility and not sure the rationale why.

I use emonhub as my RF hub for sending and receiving to lots of JeeNodes, so this functionally is very useful (it saves me have yet another node connected for TX to the RF network when the emonpi is perfect for it).

Looking forward to understanding your thinking on this, and again, GREAT work… your research and fantastic explanation has helped me start to figure out how to get STM32 talking to my RF network in a compatible way.


I’d like to be able to answer properly - but to do that will mean taking me away from the emonTx V4 and looking back quite a long time to see where the Reverse Polish actually was, and what I did, which might give me a clue as to why. You are of course free to develop, and if you wish publish, your own version.

No problems Robert. I’m sorry I didn’t discover this thread sooner. It would have saved me a lot of time (thankfully only thinking time, not coding).

I’ll take a crack at getting your code to accept the previous notation for sending only so it can be plug and play. Do you have it on GitHub somewhere so I can clone it and then send a pull request if I get that far ?

Thank you again

No, it will never go on Github. I wasted far too much time trying to understand it, finally giving up. I see no advantage to me in it. If it’s on Github, I had no part in it. If you want me to comment or consider a change, the place to do so is on the release Topic or associated comments here.

Having looked again at your post, it looks as if you’re totally confused. Nothing has changed in the way the data is presented to the RFM69CW. Just as before, it accepts a message meaning whatever you want it to mean, the only change (which makes Native and Classic formats incompatible) is in the header, as is explained above and in the supporting documentation. Nothing affects the message you send to a JeeNode - provided that it too can receive and handle the Native format.

What has changed is the format of the command string to calibrate the emonTx and associated devices - with the notable exception of the emonGLCD software, which your complaint wrongly states has changed. The RP notation cannot be handled by the calibration software and sending a digit first would cause problems, this is why it is blocked. This was after consultation with Glyn & Trystan and with their full support and agreement.

Hi Robert,

We are talking about emonpiCM, correct ?
The emonhub sends commands today in the reverse polish format, notably using the ‘s’ postfix. This can easily be validated by looking about at the python code.
Currently you send a MQTT msg to emonhub/tx//values/msg/ with the BYTES you want to transmit, encoded specifically according to the emonhub TX definition.
Your change breaks this as it is no longer accepted, nor does it accept a decimal string which is converted into bytes for onward transmission.

I refer you to lines 235 - 256 of for TX. In fact looking at the entire file it relies on the current implementation for any commands SENT to the uC.
This breaks inter-operability and will require changes to this code and additionally any existing software that uses it for tx. Not great I’m sure.
But, I think you’ve misunderstood my comment, so please do read it again and look at the current code to see how it works. Your CM code is a great improvement so I think getting it 100% compatible is a worthy endeavour.

However, I came on here to post some other news, which is that I’m finding the RF12b sending RFM69 packets to be buggy and unreliable. The simple idea to change the define in the code and restart / recompile does not work, except in the most simplistic cases.
For example - do this in the standard rfdemo sketch and you’ll find it doesn’t work. Even after manually sorting out the rf12_initialization. In short, the ONLY way I could get it to work is comment out the PRGMEM definition for help1 text. In that case it worked (after some other prodding). However, this is without even calling the help to execute the function to display the help text, so there is a rather nasty memory corruption bug somewhere in the RF12 libs. This took many many hours to bottom out.

I then verified this by trying on my own known code (for controlling rollerblinds), which would not get past a simple f12_initialise (hung) on the same board, and it works perfectly with the old packet mode. Flipping the ```RF12_COMPAT back to zero and no issues.

With the upcoming emonpi2 release, I guess we need to figure out the way forward. I think JCW has been pretty quiet over the years and moved onto other things… embello is pretty quiet and bugs don’t seem to get fixed. In my opinion it’s a dead codebase, and even the the jeenode/jeelib website is now found mostly on the wayback machine. You are now essentially have to maintain the RF69 code.

Given my tests, that conclude for me at least that RF12 doing native RFM69 packets is far from stable and therefore inter-operability not guaranteed, it may be time to look again at lowpowerlab, which is at least developed and supported.
Changing the code for a small handful of devices would not be super difficult and the decision forced to use a different packet format made, we may as well make something that is current.

That’s my 2c on this, but at the very least, this needs some more testing to make it work with current ecosystem of things that may have RF12 onboard (which from OEM is only the emonGLCD, right ?).

I’ve spent a good few hours on this at this point and unless you want to take the decision that sending will not work without changes upstream, I’d step back and re-evaluate.

Again, sorry I’m late to this party.