Hi David @hank31980,
- I’d say you’ve made tremendous progress in just 2 weeks!
. - For continuous operation (and without any personal knowledge of the 16kW unit), I’d guess that you are close to the LWT limit. The 15Hz minimum inverter frequency you are seeing compares with the 14Hz I can get on my 8kW unit (but then only with #2091 = 1, and at OATs higher than ~7degC).
- Whether this operating strategy is the best from a CoP and power consumption perspective is harder to say, and something I am wrestling with myself. I’m increasingly inclined to suspect that continuous “low and slow” isn’t necessarily the economic optimum. I gathering evidence that, because the instantaneous CoP seems to be higher when the HP is running at high output (the “parasitic” losses being proportionately lower), it may be better to deliberately cycle it. That is, running it hard for half an hour then stopping it for half an hour (rather than just trundling along at half speed) actually uses less power in the long run, as long as you don’t mind your room cooling a bit during the “off” period. (This evidence is being validated somewhat by @TrystanLea with his Dynamic Heat Pump Simulator thread right now.)
- My tentative conclusion is that #2091 = 1, whilst giving a stable, minimum-cycling operation, may actually result in higher running costs than the #2091 = 2-4 options, as long as the consequent cycling is not excessive.
- This sort of leads into your question about a possible “derate parameter” to emulate the smaller units in the range. If you are already running your compressor at or close to its minimum permissible speed (there are several things that may have made Samsung set this minimum, including loss of lubrication, onset of compressor surge, thrust bearing design, inverter efficiency etc etc) the only other thing it can do is stop (i.e. cycle). I may be missing something, but isn’t setting its cycle rate so that it runs for just 50% of the time (each hour, say) equivalent to running an 8kW unit continuously?




