This might be a little off topic but I think it is relevant.
As it stands in the UK today it is illegal for you to install a heat pump under permitted development.
This is because MCS020 (the standard used to decide if heat pumps are quiet enough) doesn’t just demand that the heat pump is tested (MCS007) and you do the desktop calculation to see if it will be quiet enough.
MCS020 also demands that you pay an MCS union contractor to physically install the heat pump (MCS3005) otherwise the desktop calculation for noise is invalid
This is absolutely outrageous.
You don’t need to pay a Brick Union contractor to physically install the bricks for the desktop calculation for colour to be valid. If the brick looks right that’s all that is matters under Planning Permission.
You don’t need to pay a Structural Engineer to physically install the steels for the desktop calculation for strength to be valid. If the steels are the right spec and installed to the drawing that is all that matters for Building Control.
MCS are currently running a sham consultation on MCS020 that asks if it can be made simpler and more streamlined:
Please do respond to let them know your thoughts.
The consultation is sham - they don’t provide a box on the official form for you to answer the question on how it can be made simpler and more streamlined because they don’t want the answers.
If you email them then we can show they have received your response and we can then raise it with government why MCS are being allowed to block the rollout of heat pumps unless the physical installation is completed by their union members.
My response is as follows:
Hello,
I would like to submit a response to Question 1.5 of your consultation on MCS020.
Unfortunately the form provided for responses does not provide a space to answer this question. I am therefore responding via email as an individual, name Marko Cosic, date 12/01/2024.
As it stands in the UK today it is illegal for you to install a heat pump under permitted development.
This is because MCS020 (the standard used to decide if heat pumps are quiet enough) doesn’t just demand that the heat pump is tested (MCS007) and you do the desktop calculation to see if it will be quiet enough.
MCS020 also demands that you pay an MCS contractor to physically install the heat pump (MCS3005) otherwise the desktop calculation for noise is not considered valid.
This is an outrageous barrier to the deployment of heat pumps in the UK.
This is a planning matter. Planning is concerned about public amenity. The heat pump should not be too noisy or visually obtrusive.
MCS020 and MCS007 provide a formula to decide if a heat pump installation will be quiet enough to be acceptable. If one follows the formula the heat pump installation is deemed quiet enough to proceed under permitted development.
That ought to be the end of the matter. Unfortunately MCS has decided to overstep their remit by demanding that the heat pump is also physically installed by an MCS member in order to be quiet enough to proceed under permitted development.
This is a commercial matter not a planning matter. If MCS wish to exercise “collective bargaining” by erecting artificial barriers to heat pump rollout; that is within MCS rights. It is NOT however appropriate to abuse the Planning and Permitted Development process in order to restrict the physical installation of the heat pump to MCS members only.
As such my first suggestion, or indeed my request, is for MCS to separate planning matters from commercial matters; desktop calculations from physical installations; by removing any requirement in MCS020 that the heat pump is installed by MCS contractors in order for the MCS020 noise calculation to be valid and the unit to be installed under permitted development rules.
This will have the effect of allowing anybody to install heat pumps that comply with the noise requirements under permitted development; even if they are not - at present - able to access government funding unless they also use an MCS contractor.
My second suggestion is on visual amenity. An energy supplier recently announced a heat pump with all the visual amenity of the child of a grit bin and a sex toy. Historically common sense has been sufficient to ensure that products are not too ostentatious from a visual perspective. Perhaps an additional requirement could be considered to avoid heat pumps being visually too loud - or otherwise “in keeping” with their surroundings.
This is less pressing than removing the barrier to deploying heat pumps in the UK that MCS currently represents by demanding that MCS members are used to physically install the heat pump in order for it to be legal under permitted development.
Please acknowledge receipt of this consultation response.
Thanks,
–
Marko