No sorry, that won’t work - 1624.
Where is the BOM/Part incorrect - this is from KICAD. The 1624 is listed correctly.
The pre-compiled file will be specifically for the ATTINY1624, so won’t work if you are testing it against a 1614.
EDIT:
Looking at the BOM file, I can see where the confusion has occured - the footprint for the ATTINY chip is shared between the 1614/1624 part, but the actual part number ATTINY1624-SSU-ND is correct.
Row,Description,Part,References,Value,Footprint,Quantity Per PCB,Status,Datasheet,LCSCStockCode,PartNumber,JLCPCBRotation
21,"20MHz, 16kB Flash, 2kB SRAM, 256B EEPROM, SOIC-14",ATtiny1614-SS,U2,ATTINY1624-SSU-ND,SOIC-14_3.9x8.7mm_P1.27mm,1, ,http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/ATtiny1614-data-sheet-40001995A.pdf,C3237666,ATTINY1624-SSU-ND,
I’ve also raised a bug for the Python error you see when compiling natively without cloning the GIT repository [link]