@Simsala@mozster I see you both have managed to setup gas consumption monitoring. Would you care to share how you did it, parts used, photos, input/feed processing and any code you might have used?
Really interested in doing this (as are others I guess) but have never managed to find a solid example of it working.
A couple of things to note when using cat5 - thereās two ways if wiring the cable (T568A or B) so just need to be careful which strands are connected to which pin and also the RJ45 plug isnāt plug and play you need to reboot the emonPi not just restart the Pi (I was pulling my hair out for a little while before I found that in the forums)
The reed switch itself is blutacked onto the meter, Iām not sure how secure this is, but Iāll hot glue it if it falls offā¦
I bought one of these hall sensors ages ago. Iāve managed to get it setup and it works with a magnet but not on the meter. I suspect it is not sensitive enough having read this item off the Forum archive. Yes I did try it both ways round as it is unipolar.
I am really after a 3 wire omnipolar, 3.3V sensor I can hook straight into a Pi clone I have lying about.
Iām going to try one of these as they seem really sensitive. I can always move it further away! Alternatively there is another one that is a little less sensitive if this does not work.
My reed switch appears to generate two pulses per rotation. Iām using the default emonPi pulse counting code in the Atmel for now and havenāt needed to make any changes to the way it debounces.
I was initially a bit concerned I might have some weird switch bouncing issue, but the pulses seem to be stable and occur when the least significant ring(?) is at 5 and 9ā¦ so Iāve adjusted my scaling calc to take it into account and will observe and compare to my meter readings for a bit.
The 2 pulses per rotation are most likely a result of contact bounce and do require a debounce correction to be trusted, the only time you would expect to reliably see 2 counts per rotation is if both the rising edge and the falling edge were being counted, which I do not think is the case in the stock sketches.
Beware - I saw a post some time ago where someone complained that the standard sketch did not count both rising and falling edges, and proposed a ācorrectionā. I donāt know whether this was implemented or not.
Iām not sure. If the hall sensor is omnipolar, as the magnet gets to the bottom, the flux will be perpendicular to the sensor and could trigger it again.
You should be able to tell by timing the pulses as the rotation is pretty constant.
Oh! Now you say it, that sounds familiar but having just checked (what I think is) the current emonpi and emonTx firmwares it looks like they both count falling edges only, I havenāt checked emonTH.
[ I wish we used reusable code files or a central library for these functions that are repeated so often in so many sketches ]
Would that mean it will always reliably trigger it twice or just that it might trigger it twice more often than not? Half or double the pulses is a pretty big swing if itās not permanently in either the single pulse or double pulse camp.
I observed it for a few mins and the count increments appeared to be consistently at the same point of rotation on counter (on 5 and 9), so I thought it would be safely and reliably triggering twice, though not sure if thereās an easy way to check? My plan was to observe for a few days and see if there was much driftā¦
Depends if at the furthest point, the flux is sufficient to reliably trigger the hall sensor. If the flux strength is marginal, the reliability of the second pulse may be a problem.
Of course if it is a unipolar sensor this does not happen. Logically you therefore should use a unipolar for a rotating magnet and a omnipolar for a passing, or approaching magnet. In either case you do not want a latch.
Iāve been tracking my readings for a few days, Iām getting a few missed pulses so my setup isnāt completely accurate, hereās my data:
Pulsecount
Meter reading
Pulse diff
Meter diff
missing pulses
error
1140
36628.10
-
-
-
1371
36629.24
231
1.14
3
1.30%
5760
36651.04
4389
21.80
29
0.66%
9346
36668.82
3586
17.78
30
0.84%
17793
36710.81
8447
41.99
49
0.58%
I could possible move the sensor further away from the dial and see if that makes a difference but I think I can live with the error rate, I guess thereāll be errors from the calorific value tooā¦ a quick scan of my bills shows it generally ranging between 39.4 - 39.6 with occaisonal rates as low as 38 and as high as 40.
What do you mean by ādigital displayā? Is it a mechanical meter with a digital display like post no. 13 above, or an electronic meter with a LCD digital display?
If it is the second, then unless there is a connection provided or there is a part of the display that is always present, I think it is unlikely that it can be done.
If it is the mechanical type, then you use a magnetic compass (someone tried a Smartphone compass, it did not work) and you try to find a magnet, which the IN-Z62 sensor in the picture is detecting. The magnet is usually inside the āfastestā wheel - in the picture 0.001 m3. Hold the magnetic compass close to the fastest register wheel. If it swings as a certain number goes past, it means thereās a magnet inside the wheel and you can use that. If you detect a magnet, then you can use a magnetic reed switch if you cannot buy the correct attachment for your meter.
Alternatively, there might be a reflective patch on the register which you can detect optically, though this tends to be harder and less reliable.
If you cannot detect a magnet, and donāt have a reflective patch, I have read of a camera & character recognition software that reads the display, but this is costly.
Sorry, no. It was a long time ago, but Iām reasonably certain it came from a search. It was a commercially produced device, I got the impression it was American but I could be wrong there.
This must not be confused with a home experimenter whoād used a mouse to recognise a pointer going round and round.
Have you tried a search for āocr meter readingā?